GST/HST — couple built one home for sale and one to live in
My clients were a married couple who had bought a large home in Toronto, which they lived in for some years with their children. They tore it down and severed the property into two, building two new homes, intending to sell one and live in the other as they moved towards retirement.
Construction proceeded and both homes were close to ready (the family had moved to their cottage in the meantime). However, the wife lost her job as a senior marketing executive, and the husband realized he would need to give up his business due to a degenerative medical condition. He sold the business as well as the office building it operated from, and the couple decided to leave Toronto, sell their cottage also, and move to British Columbia.
As a result, the couple sold both new homes rather than just one, though they lived in one for a short time before selling it. They collected and remitted HST on one home as they had always intended to sell one; and they treated the other as being built as their own home, and so did not claim input tax credits on the construction costs and did not collect or remit HST on the sale.
Three years later, the couple received a letter and questionnaire from CRA GST/HST Audit, seeking information on the two homes they had sold as well as other properties they had owned (such as the cottage and the office building). Before replying, they came to me for assistance.
I drafted a careful reply letter for the couple, knowing what the CRA auditor was looking for and what needed to be the focus of the response. I presented the story in a clear and coherent format, with evidence and reasons to show how the couple had intended all along to live in one of the two new homes. It was only because of the husband’s medical condition, along with the wife losing her job and now being able to work for herself as a consultant, that they decided to move out west. Nevertheless, I advised the couple that it was still quite possible the CRA would propose to assess them for not remitting HST on the second sale, on the ground that they had not proven the second home was intended solely for their personal use.
The couple sent their response (which I had drafted) to the auditor. A month later, the auditor advised that she was closing her file and the CRA would not assess the couple for HST. The couple were extremely relieved and grateful that they had invested the resources up front to have me prepare a careful and detailed submission to Audit, rather than having to respond to an audit proposal letter, or to file a Notice of Objection, or to appeal the matter to Tax Court of Canada — all of which would be much more expensive.